The hubub regarding Sam and Ruby that everyone's wanking about

[fangirl_says]

You know, I'm all for taking a wait-and-see attitude about the whole situation between Sam and Ruby. But what I don't get is the level of animosity against the OP in this post. (ETA: Post has been bahleeted.) Jumpin' Jehovah, people, do you really need to crucify the person for having an opinion? Are conjecture and speculation about things that may come to pass now verboten?

This whole thing has already gotten nastier than most of the Wincest/anti-Wincest wank. If the situation actually does come to fruition, this fandom is going to explode.

Comments

Re: I guess I'm not communicating well, which is par for the course with me.

[zillah975]

*nods* I'd question whether "persistent vegetative state" would make it not rape, but certainly if the original owner of the body isn't there anymore and the only inhabitant is willing and able to consent, then yes, that would not be rape.

Also, that's a really cute icon. :)

That's a *great* question

[katelennon.livejournal.com]

Which us into a whole new area of discussion- one that I am woefully uneducated in, so I"m going to check with my sis- who is a Physicians Assistant (almost) and can give me a little background.

I love icons, they just make me happy.