I see what you did there.
Oct. 1st, 2009 08:27 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
So, after reading that heartbreaking list of celebrities who think poor, misunderstood Roman Polanski shouldn't have to be punished for drugging and raping a 13-year-old girl, I was much more encouraged to see this list of celebrities who are speaking out against him.
Dear Hollywood:
JSYK, many of us are taking notes. For myself, I can tell you that the movies, television and other art forms that I will be watching and supporting in the future are being determined right now. If you think a man who raped a child should not have to pay for his crimes, I have no use for you or any entertainment of yours that may be offered from now on.
JSYK.
Watching what you are doing there,
Me.
Dear Hollywood:
JSYK, many of us are taking notes. For myself, I can tell you that the movies, television and other art forms that I will be watching and supporting in the future are being determined right now. If you think a man who raped a child should not have to pay for his crimes, I have no use for you or any entertainment of yours that may be offered from now on.
JSYK.
Watching what you are doing there,
Me.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:54 pm (UTC)Awkwarrrrrrd!
Me, I'm with George Stefanopoulis, Bare Naked Lady Steven Page, Jewel, Kirstie Alley (hey, we all hafta have some awkward, huh), Kevin Smith, and thank the Lord Neil Gaiman!
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 12:57 pm (UTC)And man, I think I would've turned in my membership card to the human race if Neil Gaiman had spoken out for Polanski. Phew.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 01:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 01:45 pm (UTC)*hugs Neil like whoa*
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 01:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 06:51 pm (UTC)Okay, no, not really, but there it is.
Incidentally, the link goes to the post where I read about Weinstein's actions, but the post links to the article, which, I'm disgusted to report, is an editorial by Weinstein himself. You don't want to read it. Trust me.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 07:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 04:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 04:20 pm (UTC)I think he just needs to watch Dawson's Creek.
For all eternity.
Locked in a movie theater that smells like old cheese and locker room socks.
With lots of salty salted popcorn and no water.
Also the theme song will play every five minutes.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 05:12 pm (UTC);)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 05:20 pm (UTC)Therefore he should like ART.
Hey I left out the screaming kid behind him and the two teenagers three rows back who constantly throw popcorn and M&Ms at his neck. That's me being merciful.;)
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 07:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 08:10 pm (UTC)"By their extraterritorial nature, film festivals the world over have always permitted works to be shown and for filmmakers to present them freely and safely, even when certain States opposed this.
The arrest of Roman Polanski in a neutral country, where he assumed he could travel without hindrance, undermines this tradition: it opens the way for actions of which no-one can know the effects."
I don't support Polanski's actions, but I do support the idea expressed above.
And in regards to Polanski's actions, I don't side with him. I side with the victim, Samantha Geimer, who has moved on, forgiven him, and even asked LA Prosecutors to drop the case, multiple times. Being a victim of child rape myself, I respect and understand why. It is unfair to her and her family to have the details brought up time and time again. It is also unfair for rape victims suffering now, this year, who can better use the resources being expended on this case.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 08:15 pm (UTC)The only reason this has been dragged out for over 30 years is because Polanski dragged it out. If he had simply served his time back when he admitted he raped her, everyone involved could have moved on. That's completely on him.
no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 09:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-10-01 11:19 pm (UTC)